The Road Ordinance is not a good project for the Town of Groton

Vote NO on November 6th for the Road Ordinance.

 The Road Ordinance is not a good project for the Town of Groton.

The council should send projects to referendum that they support, are essential and a proper use of the taxpayers hard earned money.  The Road Ordinance Referendum is none of that.  The current road project approval process includes road projects among the Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) reviewed by the Town Council and the RTM. 

The reason for moving road projects to a referendum is due to the fact that road projects are routinely cut from the budget by either the Town Council or RTM.  The Road Ordinance Referendum changes that process.  Perhaps a “referendum” or “let the voters decide” is the best way to allocate money for roads, however there was zero discussion on the RTM regarding this change and the pros and cons moving forward.  Also interestingly, the members most opposed to a budget referendum spoke in favor of the Road Ordinance Referendum.

The taxpayers cannot afford more taxes and should not accept the tax and spend status quo that is Groton.  During the budget deliberations last spring there was NO effort on the part of the Town to reduce spending in any way.  In fact the 2013 budget was a level services budget with a hefty tax increase. 

As revenue sources are decreasing the Town continually places a greater burden on the taxpayers without any decrease in spending.  This is completely unacceptable and proves that the people in positions of power in Groton are disconnected from the taxpayers, who cannot handle the never ending tax increases. 

The Road Ordinance Referendum has $6.4M for town roads, $3.5M for City Roads, $1M for GLP roads, $300K to insure bonds and a staggering $2.3M in interest.

For a real cost to the taxpayers of $13.5M

Is this project worth it?  I do not believe it is.

The Town of Groton must prioritize projects WITHOUT additional burden to the taxpayers.  If the people in the positions of power in Groton determine that a $13.5M Road Project is an essential, worthwhile, and appropriate use of taxpayers hard earned dollars, then $13.5M needs to be decreased from the budget by eliminating and scaling back items that are nonessential or of lower priority. 


This post is contributed by a community member. The views expressed in this blog are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Patch Media Corporation. Everyone is welcome to submit a post to Patch. If you'd like to post a blog, go here to get started.

Mariellen V. French September 28, 2012 at 06:16 PM
The newest Town Councillor ran on looking at income before deciding how much to spend, which got my vote. That's how most of us plan our personal spending. And, the recent report that shows Groton in the 25 economically distressed towns in Connecticut, MUST open the eyes of our elected officials to the fact that most of us do not make the salaries of Town Department Heads. After a lifetime of being part of the middle class, my income is now just above the poverty level. Any more increase in property taxes will be difficult for me and other Groton residents. Thanks for speaking up.
augie42 September 28, 2012 at 07:15 PM
M. French, Good point on the economically distressed label that now proves my point! Moreover, the salaries in Groton gov't are much higher in aggregate than similiar surrounding towns.
Ed Johnson October 02, 2012 at 03:28 PM
As mentioned above, we can have a Referendum regarding the roads. Why not the Town Budget? Is someone afraid they might lose political control? Is there an "agenda" on this subject? Perhaps by voting NO on the road referendum, this can act as a signal to the Council that we want a change. Because...apparently...the landslide rejection of the Phase II school proposal wasn't enough to get the Council's attention.
augie42 October 03, 2012 at 12:12 AM
Good point Ed. Is ANYONE on the council listening to the voters? I believe the voters again will send a message to the council and defeat this ordinance of convenience and unnecessary spending. The alternative is to spend the $2 million on roads every year (without interest) and plan it like other towns do, with some cuts in programs that are not essential.
Join Kevin January 24, 2013 at 07:12 AM
cheap convenient and creditworthy is our online store's (http://www.3cjerseys.com) service tenet . you can buy all kinds of cheap nfl jerseys here , just as nfl jerseys , basketball jerseys , NHL jerseys , Football jerseys ,the new era hats , we also provide jerseys customized service . All the products in our website are from china with wholesale price , so you can buy cheap products wiht high quality ! Now ,you can choose different payment in our website ,just as paypal , western union and VISA credit card . more information please visit http://www.3cjerseys.com .


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »